| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
gensing |
#801 | |||
|
According to this mention in a local film critic blog, 'I'm With
Cancer' will be filming in Vancouver, BC, starting in mid-February. Has anyone heard who the director is going to be?
VIVA LE FROG!!!
|
||||
|
|
||||
gensing |
#802 | |||
|
Calling this a rumor is really stretching it - but it is an author who has sold the rights to his book saying JM would be the perfect lead. I'd love to
see James as a double agent!!
VIVA LE FROG!!!
|
||||
|
|
||||
Boops.atlanticcityone |
#803 | |||
|
Never read teh book-but secret ageent is close to assassin and would get him in an action pic again-so I second that!
|
||||
|
|
||||
Bluebell66 |
#804 | |||
|
I've just read that article about Agent ZigZag...and I loved that the author mentioned James' good looks and acting skills!
Sounds like a fascinating role, and it would be great seeing James as a mysterious double agent! |
||||
|
|
||||
Island29 |
#805 | |||
|
It looks like Toby Maguire could be playing Bilbo Baggins. Maguire recently revealed in a junket that he might soon be working with Guillerma del Toro. LATINO
REVIEW went and confirmed with their sources at CAA, that they are talking to the producers of The Hobbit about casting Maguire in the lead. If this is true, I
feel that James turned down the role. We now have to wait and see how true this is.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Helen M |
#806 | |||
|
Island - Tobey has denied that rumor and said he thought James was up for the part. I'll try to find the article.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Island29 |
#807 | |||
|
Yes, I did see that. Thank you. I am glad he's not doing "The Hobbit". James could still be the one.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Helen M |
#808 | |||
|
Well, here's more info about the Tobey-Bilbo rumor from a good source. Also an interesting take on Hollywood does business.
Bottom line: I think we'll just have to wait to see what happens. So is Tobey Maguire a Hobbit or not? And will 'Spiderm4n' happen on time?
Posted on Thursday, Dec 17, 2009 By Drew McWeeny
To be Bilbo Baggins, or not to be Bilbo Baggins... that is the question. The online world has changed in many ways over the last 12 years, since I've been an active online presence, and in other ways, it's exactly the same as it's always been. One outlet writes something they believe as fact, another outlet runs a piece calling them liars, and then the flame wars start. I've been the guy who has been the source of many of these rumors, and I know that when I run something as a fact... even if it's being denied in public by the parties involved... I've been right a large majority of the time. I know the difference between a rumor and a fact, but I'm also aware that merely reporting on something can create a Schrodinger's Cat effect on the story, which makes things even more slippery. El Mayimbe over at Latino Review is wired deeply into the agency community. That's not guesswork... it's a fact. His sources are agency sources, and 12 years of doing this has taught me that agency sources are some of the best. Everything passes through agencies at some point, and so if he's adamant that CAA is having the conversation about Tobey Maguire as Bilbo Baggins in "The Hobbit," rest assured... they're having that conversation. Doesn't matter what Movieline or The Hollywood Reporter says. Doesn't matter how many publicists offer carefully worded denials. Doesn't even matter if Tobey Maguire himself plays coy with the press and says he's not sure what they're talking about. There's no way to know at this moment if he will end up in the movie or not, but have those conversations happened? Count on it. What may factor into the final decision far more than whether or not Maguire is right for the part is whether or not Maguire is available for the part. The story is spreading today that "Spider-Man 4," which is evidently being called "Spider-M4n" internally, may be on indefinite hold over script disagreements between Raimi and the studio. Good. If there's any lesson Sam Raimi must have learned from "Spider-Man 3," it is that he can't roll film on a script that he doesn't like, featuring villains he doesn't want, because the final product will reflect his indifference clearly. Frankly, I'm surprised Raimi still has any fire in his belly for this franchise. If he really does direct the fourth film, he will have stayed aboard long past the expiration date I predicted. Very few filmmakers ever direct four films in a franchise, especially inside of a decade. It's basically unprecedented. And with Maguire, it's got to be harder and harder to muster the enthusiasm. They are notoriously demanding films, physically speaking, and Maguire has back issues that must make it difficult to harness up and swing around each time out. Yes, something like "The Hobbit" would also be a demanding shoot, but I don't remember Bilbo Baggins using webbing to swing everywhere, which is what Maguire's specific issue with the "Spider-Man" films seems to be. Do I think he's the right man for the role? Not really? I love the notion of Martin Freeman playing Bilbo, and I thought the rumors of David Tennant were appealing as well. I have no problem with the idea of an American hobbit... Elijah and Sean did just fine in their roles... but I just don't think Tobey's got the right charisma for a Bilbo. There's a twinkle of mischief to Bilbo that defines him, and I don't think that's Tobey. Still, this isn't happening tomorrow. Guillermo Del Toro is still working with Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, and Phillippa Boyens on the script for "The Hobbit," and when I saw Peter recently, he said that they were planning to cast a very, very wide net for Bilbo because they wanted to see all their options before making any choices, and he was very open to the notion of an unknown if that's the person they feel would work best. The real lesson here is (A) don't tell El Mayimbe he's dead wrong about something, because the guy does his legwork, and if something changes after he reports it, that doesn't mean he had his facts wrong when he published and (B) actors and publicists lie to the press, and acting like every word they speak is truth is just ignorant. Time will tell.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Island29 |
#809 | |||
|
Thanks for the article, it's an interesting read on what goes on.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Boops.atlanticcityone |
#810 | |||
|
Interesting that he doesnt mention James at all!
|
||||
|
|
||||
gensing |
#811 | |||
|
Can we put this "Tobey Maguire is Bilbo" rumor to rest. Please.
Tobey Maguire has denied reports that he is to appear in upcoming movie The Hobbit
VIVA LE FROG!!!
|
||||
|
|
||||
Helen M |
#812 | |||
|
There are a lot of specifics in this article but I'm putting it in the rumor category until Variety or THR confirm it.
The Next James Bond is ... James McAvoy. Sort Of. McAvoy Attached to Ian Fleming Pic / Dustin Rowles December 29, 2009 Palmstar Entertainment and Animus Films are developing a biopic based on the life of Ian Fleming, according to our source, The Hollywood Cog. Currently
working under the title, Ian Fleming, the movie will be about the man behind James Years before creating Bond, Fleming struggled and floundered under the shadow of his family name (his father was a member of Parliament, and his siblings were also well-known, as well, including Peter - a travel writer). Likable but lost, Fleming was little but an aimless playboy, until his experiences in World War 2 changed his life, and it was those autobiographical experiences during war time that inspired James Bond, who was based - in part - on Fleming. The movie itself will be based on the book, Ian Fleming: The Man Behind James Bond, by Andrew Lycett, who has also written books on Arthur Conan The big news here, however, is that the movie - which has been independently financed to the tune of around $40 million - has James McAvoy attached in the lead, which sadly probably takes him out of the running to replace Daniel Craig in the future. McAvoy actually seems well suited to the role - he can do playboy (Bright Young Things), he can do period and war movie (Atonement), and he can do action (Wanted). Plus, he's an excellent actor with a dry sense of humor befitting not just Fleming, but Bond. Ian Fleming is a high priority project, though I'm not sure where it will fall in with McAvoy's schedule - he's currently got I'm with Cancer and Wanted 2 in the works, and he's already wrapped filming on The Conspirator. Given the movie's limited budget, however, it would seem the sort of film McAvoy could squeeze in between a comedy and an action sequel which I don't believe even has a finished script, yet. The project is currently searching for a director, who will be working off a script from Matt Brown (Ropewalk).
|
||||
|
|
||||
Island29 |
#813 | |||
|
This is great news. It seems like a wonderful part for him. Thanks so much for posting it. If he takes questions at the Times Arts and Leisure program on
Sunday, Jan. 10th it would be a good time to ask him about it. Hopefully Melena Ryaik will ask him about it during the interview.
|
||||
|
|
||||
lumna |
#814 | |||
|
My email has been going crazy with the various postings about JM being attached to the Ian Fleming biopic. Let's hope it's not just a rumour.
|
||||
|
|
||||